Mar 092015

This was originally posted on

by Jeff Thomas

Those who trade liberty for security deserve neither and will lose both.
John Adams

In the end, more than freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all—security, comfort, and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished foremost was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free and was never free again.

Edward Gibbon, English historian and member of Parliament, commenting on Ancient Athens in The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, published in six volumes between 1776 and 1788.

Libertarians (myself included) now grind their teeth on a daily basis, as they watch the parade of irresponsible economic measures concocted by First World political and banking leaders. Each measure seems more outrageous than the last, both in its inability to correct the situation and its outright thievery from the purse of the populace.

The EU recently announced that they will introduce a level of quantitative easing (QE) that promises to be the economic equivalent of an overdose to a heroin addict. In addition, the EU, the US, Canada, and other First World countries have created bail-in legislation that will allow their bankers to literally steal the funds of their depositors.

Further, political leaders on both sides of the Atlantic have announced that pensioners’ funds are “in danger,” and their solution is to make it mandatory for the funds to contain a percentage of investment in government bonds—an investment that promises to go off the proverbial cliff in the coming years.

So, what’s the plan? Are the leaders of the world’s most “advanced” nations planning collective economic and political suicide? Or are they simply so stupid/arrogant/out of touch with reality—pick your explanation—that they just don’t understand thateconomic collapse is now baked in the cake and it is now only a question of time?

Or do they have an alternate plan?

I must confess that I’m cynical enough to regard many of the leaders in question as being stupid, arrogant, and out of touch with reality. However, I do also believe that some of them are clever enough and devious enough to have a plan in place as to how they might continue to not only hold their power, but expand upon it. (That desire is, of course, a virtually universal truth, as regards world leaders—to always be planning greater power for themselves.)

The Yen, the Euro, and the US Dollar Will Collapse

At least three of the world’s five leading currencies will surely collapse, and very possibly, in the above order. History shows that, when a currency collapses, it’s always replaced immediately. Sometimes, the replacement is supplied by the government itself. Sometimes, the free market replaces the currency with whatever is the “next best thing.” In the last century, the US dollar has most often been the handiest next best thing, for countries from A to Z (Argentina to Zimbabwe).

But this time around, the US dollar will be one of the currencies that will be shown the door. What then?

Enter the Saviour Currency

I project that, when the dollar collapses, paper currency itself (not those who created it) will be blamed. Government leaders will wag their collective finger at those who have subverted the good that QE had been intended to do. Without putting too fine a point on it, the public will get the message that the only problem with QE was that the greedy One Percent sought to profit greatly from it, so the stimulus never sufficiently reached the man on the street.

But all will not be lost. Governments will vow to stand together to overcome the damage done by the powerful usurpers by creating a new form of currency that is fully controlled by the governments. The new form of currency will be electronic and will promise to end all monetary woes, as the governments will be able to track al lmonetary transactions of every kind. It may take the form of several new national currencies, but I believe it’s more likely that it’ll be a single IMF-centred currency that will be adopted by many countries.

Existing bank accounts would be converted to New Currency accounts and anyone who does not already have a bank account will be advised to create an account with a bank, as he will need it to perform transactions. All incoming funds (wages, sale of goods, etc.) will go directly into the account, and all outgoing funds (purchases, payments for services, etc.) will be directly debited from the account.

Importantly, the failed paper currency will be done away with, and all monetary transactions will be made through the bank account. Further, barter will be discouraged and very possibly outlawed.

But why an electronic monetary system? Because it answers all the desires of the banking institutions and governments. First, it assures that every individual must have a primary bank account, or he cannot function monetarily. This puts the bank in the driver’s seat. It can then step up the rules and increase its charges to customers.

For the government, it will mean that, since every monetary transaction made by an individual is recorded in his account, there will no longer be a need for him to file for tax payments. The government can unilaterally assess the tax due and debit it directly from the account. (If the individual disagrees with the amount of the debit, he may contest it and hope to regain a portion of his payment if he wins his case.)

In order to “avoid the hardship on the individual” of annual taxation, it will be shortened to a quarterly debit and possibly even a monthly debit. Over time, tax rates and reasons for tax debits will become increasingly complex and confusing, as will increasingly complicated bank charges.

But won’t the public be outraged? No, quite the opposite. If it’s sold to the public properly, they’ll welcome it with open arms. After all, its purpose will be “to end the manipulation of the people’s assets by a greedy few and assure that never again will the people have to endure a currency collapse.”

As Josef Goebbels advised, it’s easy to convince a population that a desired measure is necessary. First, convince them that there is a demon out there, then provide a “solution” to defeat that demon.

People will be badly shaken up by the collapse of the currency and will look to the new system to provide them with greater safety, when what they will really be getting is enslavement to banks and governments.

Still, there will be some pushback against the new system, but it may easily be trounced by the regular claims that the system will also limit financial transactions by terrorists. (Anyone who disagrees with the system might therefore be deserving of investigation for terrorism involvement.)

In 1947, when George Orwell wrote 1984, he correctly anticipated the use of technology in creating a world in which Big Brother knew all. Had Mister Orwell been writing in the age of computerisation, I have little doubt that he would have predicted the above. Certainly, any government that succeeds in controlling the monetary transactions of the individual can then control the individual.